© 2002 - 2004 www.thesciencist.org
The Sciencist
A peer-reviewed journal of
scientific discovery
|
| Hormonal
Evaluation of ‘Responsibility’ as American
Health Agonist
Kohle Torgenson
Over the past
twenty years, North American health has taken
a slow turn towards disaster. The rounded corners
that define the American waistline have recently
gained notice, and portents of pulmonary disease
have become popular cause for alarm. At the heart
of these health concerns is the phantom of stress,
which is noted frequently as a cause of health
failure in its many forms. This study identifies
and addresses “responsibility” as
an unacknowledged growing threat to American health
and the single greatest cause of stress and stress-related
illness.
[This
paper is also available in PDF format]
Introduction
American health has been maligned
for the past two decades, and continues to slip
into a state of disrepair. Increasing numbers of
American children fight diabetes every year. Obesity,
a growing health risk in America, seems to ignore
the standard social boundaries that isolate the
males from the females, the rich from the poor,
and the young from the old. Meanwhile, heart disease,
respiratory ailments, and rheumatic afflictions
abound across the North American continent. Health
officials point eager fingers at the fast food industry,
television, computer gaming, and general negligence
for the failing health of North Americans.
A known connection between pathogenic
disease and anxiety has been established (Millichek,
1999), indicating a close relationship between neurotic
expression and infectious disease. The control and
elimination of anxiety has thus been determined
to be a crucial step in the control and cessation
of illness.
In this study, the connection
between a sense of responsibility and anxiety will
be determined in a typical, stress-inducing situation
as simulated and assessed though radioimmunoassay
analysis of blood plasma obtained through a catheter,
by searching for cortisol, a hormone known to be
linked to stress.
Method
Three male subjects (Strommen,
2003), A, B and C, aged 20-25 were selected for
peak physical strength and agility from a pool of
sixty athletes seeking an alternate position on
the U.S. Pan American Games four by one hundred
meter men’s racing team. The three male participants
completed a medical assessment that determined each
to be of sound mind and body. A fifty-word adjective
association diagnostic (Trick, 2001) designed to
assess stress levels was used at five different
times: upon learning of their acceptance into the
program, at the time of catheter insertion, two
minutes after catheter insertion, one minute prior
to the race, and one minute after the race. Three
different levels of stress were simulated by employing
the following scientifically justified fabrications
of fact: runner A was informed that he had already
been assured of a spot on the Pan Am team; runner
B was told that his position on the team depended
on his running ability with the catheter in place;
and runner C was lead to believe that a one million
dollar bet had been placed on him by an undisclosed
shoe sponsor—who incidently “expected
good things” from him. The subjects ran the
race, with catheter held in place by surgical tape,
down a standard Olympic-sized racetrack. Only one
heat of the race was run. Serum cortisol levels
were assayed using a validated commercial radioimmunoassay
kit.
Results
Upon induction into the study,
runners were determined to be “excited, hopeful,
dedicated, and overjoyed” (personal communication)
to have the opportunity to participate in the stress
study and vie for the chance to be part of the Pan
American track and field team. The runners’
baseline plasma levels were extracted using a catheter,
which appeared to increase the subjects anxiety
level to “uncomfortable, awkward, and curious”
(personal communication). Baseline cortisol concentrations
for all runners ranged between 30-40 µg/dl,
well within the standard range for young male athletes.
Following a two-minute “breather,” subjects
were determined to be “comfortable, excited,
and prepared” (personal communication). Runner
A, upon being told he had already been assured a
spot on the team, was determined to have the lowest
stress level, with his serum cortisol level measured
at 34 µg/dl prior to the race, and at 33 µg/dl
after the race and reported to be “calm, cool,
confident, and satisfied” (personal communication)
both before and after the race. Runner B, believing
that his position on the team was dependent on his
performance in the race, recorded a high serum cortisol
level at 42 µg/dl prior to the race and claimed
to be “worried, concerned, and irritated”
(personal communication). Runner B displayed a serum
cortisol concentration of 51 µg/dl after the
race, and felt “perplexed, confused, and pained”
(personal communication). Runner C, who was convinced
that a his position on the team was in jeopardy,
and that the money of a potential sponsor was at
stake, showed excessive serum cortisol levels prior
to racing at 61µg/dl. He said he was “stressed,
anxious, and nauseous” (personal communication).
After the race, runner C showed decreased serum
cortisol level at 55 µg/dl and the adjectives
used to describe his mental state were “exhausted,
disappointed, and disturbed” (personal communication).
Runner B was the first to cross
the finish line, with runner C following quickly
thereafter. Runner A was the last to cross the finish
line, but also appeared to be in the best of spirits
and did not show any obvious signs of discomfort.
Runners B and C both contracted urinary infections,
which were thankfully treatable through a ten-day
regimen of mild antibiotics.
Conclusions
Responsibility in its many forms
is a powerful motivator in our society and is taught
as a tool of social control in schools, churches
and in families. But responsibility, which is frequently
lauded as a social good, positively correlates with
anxiety. It would seem that persons who feel responsible
for future outcomes have more stress and are more
prone to injury and disease. This study clearly
indicates that responsibility should be moderated
whenever possible. One reasonable strategy that
has already been implemented by Belgian lawmakers
requires people whose jobs are considered “positions
of responsibility” (personal communication)
to alternate roles with people who are able to avoid
the deleterious effects of responsibility and provide
responsibility vacations for persons of stress.
This system includes the temporary hiring of the
homeless or mentally ill to fill in for police officers,
air-traffic controllers and nurses every Friday,
providing a longer respite from the anxiety of being
“too responsible.” Legislation similar
to the so-called “Freaky Friday” law
is presently being considered by many jurisdictions
throughout Europe, and implementation is expected
within the next few years.
References
Millichek, A. (1999). Neurotic
impact on disease in post-vasected males. American
Journal of the Willingly Impotent, 3(5), 24–46.
Strommen, J. (2003). The rule of three: A technical
application of the new math. Saskatoon, Canada:
The Sciencist.
Trick, B. (2001). Adjectives as a window to mental
health. Elderly Mental Wellness Weekly, 2(12),
63–72.
|
|