The Sciencist

Homepage
• • • • •
Past News ::::
• • • • •
Instruments
• • • • •
Research Papers
• • • • •
The Sciencist Shop
• • • • •
Comments &
Submissions
• • • • •
Site Map


© 2002 - 2004

PAST NEWS – April 2004

2003
 
May

 

2004
 
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December

 

Statisticians Set to Evaluate Accuracy of “Nantucket” Limerick

Amsterdam, NL (April 26, 2004) – In what can only be described as an eyebrow-raising endeavour, a group of Dutch statisticians are eager to put lowbrow poetics to the test, hoping once and for all to establish the statistical accuracy of the “Nantucket” limerick, and put to rest all innuendo perpetuated by men from the American town of Nantucket who boisterously use the limerick’s notorious claims in an attempt to seduce Dutch women.

De koninklijke Nederlandse Groep van Statistieken (KNGS), based in Amsterdam, was awarded on Thursday its seventh consecutive federal grant for “the study of the accuracy of self-aggrandizing innuendo”—a little-known field of research annually sponsored by the Nederlandse Sociale Wetenschap en de Raad voor Onderzoek van Menswetenschappen [Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Holland], or NSWROM. Past research sponsored by NSWROM included a landmark study in 1983 into the accuracy of the statement “you know what they say about the size of a man’s hands,” and a 1999 KNGS study regarding the honesty of men who employ the phrase, “excuse me for a moment, I have to see a man about a horse.”

“Our [recently announced] research will employ a case study framework. We are exclusively interested in the claims of men from Nantucket, and those who claim to be from Nantucket. We want to study their assets and scientifically determine if in fact, as they say in America, ‘their money is where their mouth is,’” explained Dr. Anika van Meenen, Research Chair for KNGS.

Members of the Massachusetts’ Board of Certified Urologists were unavailable for comment.

 

Canine Milk: From Fido to Fridge

Bogotá, CO (April 19, 2004) – Late-night trips to the grocery store for milk may be a thing of the past thanks to University of Bogotá scientist Dr. Alejandro Garcia’s newly-patented technology. The Colombian engineering professor has adapted commercial milking equipment used by the dairy industry to suit the average household dog, Canus domesticus. Dr. Garcia explained in a press conference on Saturday how “the teat cups and vacuum system have been down-sized to accommodate the miniature nipple size of the average canine pet.” He went on to emphasize the importance of proper sanitization before applying the automated milker.

Marketing consultants for the canine milker applaud its ingenuity and timeliness. “In this age of increased hormone and antibiotic-injected dairy cows, the consumer can now be safe with the milk from our canine friends. Personally, I prefer knowing exactly where the milk on my breakfast cereal comes from, and that it hasn’t been mixed together with the milk of more than one cow,” stated spokesperson Fabia Cortez of Lechaliticas Group in Bogotá. Convenience aside, recent studies by Dr. Garcia’s counterparts at El Instituto de la Leche Homogeneizidad at the University of Cartegena have shown that canine milk contains equivalent amounts of calcium when compared to the traditional bovine variety. Average shelf-life in the consumer’s fridge is also comparable when combined with “Alejandro’s Home Pasteurization Kit,” named after Dr. Garcia’s son and said to be in production later this year.

Preliminary market research indicates that a family of four may easily cut a monthly milk budget in half given the average litre- or quart-per-day production rate of an active and healthy Fido. The canine milker is to be most easily applied to larger breeds such as German Shepherds, Irish Wolfhounds and Golden Retrievers, but, Dr. Garcia warns, due to certain anatomical mistakes made during consumer focus-group testing “is to be used with female dogs only.”

 

Pizza for Nut Cream Fair Trade, Not Biopiracy

Oruro, BO (April 12, 2004) – Mega-corporation and leading biotechnology innovator Omnisource Co., Ltd. is once again being accused of biopiracy, this time for stealing knowledge from the Campesinos, a Bolivian indigenous population, by trading common pizza recipes for information on the skin softening chemical/cream “Prodermicin” found in local nuts. Biopiracy, or the stealing of ancient knowledge from indigenous cultures to make new technology, is reputed to be a common practice in Bolivia.

In an official press release Omnisource claimed, “The equitable partnership established between the Campesinos and Omnisource Co., Ltd. is mutually beneficial. Furthermore, the allegation that biopiracy was committed by Omnisource is both ridiculous and slanderous.”

Noted ecologist and ethicist Paulo Quispé referred to the “Prodermicin incident” as a “clear example of unethical behaviour, contravening vital ethical principles, by the inequitable sharing of resources and exploitation of indigenous knowledge.”

When asked to comment on Quispé’s remarks, Omnisource president and CEO Paul Fortinbrau commented, “I emphatically deny that biopiracy has been committed in our dealings with the Campesinos. Biopiracy is an unethical practice rooted in inequality among partners. Clearly the Campesino people will benefit from the knowledge we shared with them, just as we plan to benefit from the small intellectual property that they shared with us.”

When asked how he could equate sacred indigenous knowledge with a standard pizza recipe, Fortinbrau quickly responded, “In a region void of pizzerias and burgeoning with newfound wealth from oil pipeline construction and profitable feedlots, it wouldn’t be difficult to turn that knowledge into big dollars.” Concluding his argument, Fortinbrau pointed out that “Pizza Hut seems to be doing okay.”

 

Ohio Packers Union Cries “Fowl” over Boneless Chicken

Cleveland, US (April 5, 2004) – Recent advances in biotechnology have led to many startling developments, such as the addition of fish protein to tomatoes, or the engineering of goats that produce spider’s silk. But attempts by DNAmics Incorporated to genetically alter domestic chicken to be ‘boneless’ have met with anger from animal advocacy groups and meat processors alike.

A protest against the boneless chicken research brought the longtime enemies together for a barbeque luncheon in Pal Alto, California, on Sunday, where animal rights advocate Kip Holmes presented the Local 32 Union of Animal Packers with a soya bean-shaped medallion to commemorate the occasion. Butcher and shop steward Keith Stonehouse accepted the medallion and later stated to the press, “Normally, we think of vegetarians as weak and pathetic. But I can’t deny that Kip and his tribe of hippies show a lot of strength and courage when it comes to leaving the bones in chickens. You’ve got to admire that.”

In response to the overwhelming outcry over the research, DNAmics has halted its testing on poultry embryos. According to spokesman Dave Burns, “We never wanted to upset the vegetarians and meat-cutters. Both groups are vaguely associated with our business. Besides, chickens without bones just don’t stand up to the research process.”